Speedliner® 1000 proves itself to be the best in the test lab. The following 3 charts compares Speedliner® 1000 to Rhino Linings® Hardline®, Tuff Grip®, and Solar Max® coatings to illustrate Speedliner® 1000's superiorty in performance.
Speedliner® 1000 has undergone rigorous testing in order to accurately measure its performance in a variety of areas. Listed below are the actual Speedliner® 1000 test results performed by independent laboratories. The “Actual Results” links will show you an exact copy of the laboratories’ findings for each test.
For comparison purposes, we also show the physical properties of our competitor, Rhino Linings U.S.A., Inc. The Rhino numbers posted here are taken from Rhino Linings® own website at www.rhinoliningsindustrial.com on January 31, 2008. Specifically, we found their results posted here.
We strongly encourage you to compare our results to those of all our competitors. You will not find a stronger, more reliable, more colorfast liner anywhere!
| Test |
Speedliner® 1000 |
|
Rhino Linings U.S.A., Inc. TUFF GRIP® |
Speedliner® 1000 Advantage |
| Tensile Strength |
4700 psi |
Actual results |
1500 psi |
220% stronger |
| Tear Strength |
865 lbs/in |
Actual results |
250 lbs/in |
96% stronger |
| Abrasion test |
4.4 mg loss per 1000 rev |
Actual results |
15 mg loss Per 1000 rev |
240% stronger |
| Elongation |
570% |
Actual results |
300% |
90% stronger |
| Hardness |
92 Shore A |
|
88 Shore A |
None |
| Flammability |
0 burn rate |
Actual results |
N.A. |
|
| U.V. Strength |
80-89% gloss retention after 2000 hours |
Actual results |
N.A. |
|
| Di-Electric Strength |
278 V/mil (+/-35) |
Actual results |
N.A. |
|
| Test |
Speedliner® 1000 |
|
Rhino Linings U.S.A., Inc. Hardline® |
Speedliner® 1000 Advantage |
| Tensile Strength |
4700 psi |
Actual results |
2200 psi |
118% stronger |
| Tear Strength |
865 lbs/in |
Actual results |
250 lbs/in |
96% stronger |
| Abrasion test |
4.4 mg loss per 1000 rev |
Actual results |
30 mg loss Per 1000 rev |
581% stronger |
| Elongation |
570% |
Actual results |
80% |
612% stronger |
| Hardness |
92 Shore A |
|
55 Shore D |
None |
| Flammability |
0 burn rate |
Actual results |
N.A. |
|
| U.V. Strength |
80-89% gloss retention after 2000 hours |
Actual results |
N.A. |
|
| Di-Electric Strength |
278 V/mil (+/-35) |
Actual results |
N.A. |
|
| Test |
Speedliner® 1000 |
|
Rhino Linings U.S.A., Inc. Solar Max® |
Speedliner® 1000 Advantage |
| Tensile Strength |
4700 psi |
Actual results |
2200 psi |
118% stronger |
| Tear Strength |
865 lbs/in |
Actual results |
300 lbs/in |
63% stronger |
| Abrasion test |
4.4 mg loss per 1000 rev |
Actual results |
N.A. |
N.A. |
| Elongation |
570% |
Actual results |
150% |
280% stronger |
| Hardness |
92 Shore A |
|
90 Shore D |
None |
| Flammability |
0 burn rate |
Actual results |
N.A. |
|
| U.V. Strength |
80-89% gloss retention after 2000 hours |
Actual results |
N.A. |
|
| Di-Electric Strength |
278 V/mil (+/-35) |
Actual results |
N.A. |
|
Rhino Linings® Tuff Grip® Hardline® and Solar Max® is a registered trademark of Rhino Linings U.S.A., Inc.